• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    54
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    Congress believes it’s a national security threat which is probably true but they haven’t bothered explaining this to their constituents at all. Ideally they’d pass comprehensive privacy protection laws to setup standards that both domestic and foreign companies would be subject to. Then companies either adjust their behaviors and meet a certain level of transparency or they would be prosecuted under the law.

    But no… We get this instead: a confusing and obviously targeted ultimatum with Congress telling everyone ‘trust me bro this is the only way’.

    • just another dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3123 days ago

      deally they’d pass comprehensive privacy protection laws to setup standards that both domestic and foreign companies would be subject to.

      No, no, no. That would mean dismantling PRISM and the FISA. Gathering data on citizens is only bad when China does it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        I mean, to be fair, both are extremely bad and should be stopped, but a hostile foreign country gathering data and pushing propaganda on your citizens IS worse than you or non-hostile foreign countries doing it.

        • AWildMimicAppears
          link
          fedilink
          English
          923 days ago

          I would argue that gathering data about your own citizens is actively worse than china doing it; an average US citizen has a lot more to lose if the 3-letter-agencies or the police use it against them, because those are who you would have to deal with in person.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            223 days ago

            Valid point. I think the issue is that we know there is no good reason for China to have that data, and we know that they are hostile, so it’s an easy decision.